This entry was posted
on Thursday, November 5th, 2009 at 3:28 am and is filed under Tea Party.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
25 Responses to “Rick Santelli and the “Rant of the Year””
mark my words, cnbc is going to give him a show. and it will fail, because rick santelli is a no talent *** clown. we were already paying their mortgages at that point, would have continued to regardless, and will continue to forever. but whatever makes you feel better . . .
Obama Health Care Reform will create 53 NEW Federal Bureaucracies. It is linked to Obama and Congress. It is linked to the people and business to the IRS. (I’m looking at an organizational flow chart)
What does that tell you? Taxes will go up, up, and, away to fund this MONSTER.
Reject it with all your might. Call your Representatives.
Hey steve-did your mommy put too much pressure on you when she stopped breastfeeding you at 14 years so that now you have to take it out on everyone else? Please man, withhold the expletives and you may get some respect, but right now you make yourself look like a person who watches too much **** after smoking a big fat doobie, after you’ve finished beating your wife at your trailer house where she’s paying the rent. Other than that you’re a nice person. Santelli for President. End of the story.
Santelli’s full of ****. He’s never met a CORPORATE welfare recipient who’s **** he wouldn’t ****. So suddenly he’s all about fiscal prudence and responsibility?
Fucking lazy-ass c-lister shill for astroturfing lobby shacks. CNBC and he deserve each other.
Santelli is right on. Speaking out with some Founding Fathers’ spirit and truth. THis is what we need more of – people who speak the truth and have the courage to draw a line in the sand and say “enough”. This is America, not Amerikka.
Fortunately, government isn’t that adept at “controlling” anything.
The only way out of this is to bankrupt the debt or print money to deflate it. We’ve actually had this before, in 1979, anid 1946, with 20 percent inflation. Looks like another round of late-1970s style economies, then another tech boom.
We will survive this. The pain will be spread through inflation and persistent unemployment, but we will survive.
..the state; Barclays. The stock of that bank is now as strong as it was before the October crash of last year. But that is also one of the only banks that obviously didn´t participate in this great theft. As for the general situation we are now entering a “controlled depression”, where the government decides who are going to be the losers and who are the winners- of course the bankers win and the stockholders and the general population loses. This is us or them- they have to be ousted.
2ndand1: I think for me this boils down to a choice between supporting the banks and supporting the people. No matter how you look at it, the US´ deficit is going to grow on the short term, but by supporting the citizens, from which the money was stolen you have a cheaper solution to this situation than to give money to the banks. And people will get back what they have lost on their stocks if the government keeps out of the stock market. Look at the only UK bank that didn´t take money from..
were very unwise home purchases – NOT those who paid down, and had jobs they’ve lost, but the zero down, variable rates with payments already stretching a too-tight budget.
What about those who had to use savings or go under? Are they to be penalized b/ they survived foreclosure by being judicious? Everyone has felt the crunch, & I have friends who’ve lost a great deal of money b/of their stocks. I do not ascribe to the “Distribute the wealth” theory – & it’s not b/I have any – I don’t.
I wholeheartedly agree with you about them stealing the money from the people, and it should be paid back. The credit card companies and banks gouge citizens – and now not only are they being bailed out by the very ones they’ve already gouged, they can continue. The housing market also, but I do not believe it should be paid to individuals. It should go toward the debt of our country.
Who is to determine who is in debt b/of economy or bad management? We’ve been bled too much already. There
2ndand1: This is very simple. The government and the criminal bankers STOLE that money from the people. Now they should pay it back in the form of bailing out all those people who are now in debt because of the crisis, which has been orchestrated by the government itself and its criminal banker friends. If they don´t cancel the debts I am predicting a depression and a civil war in the USA (and this will spread very rapidly to other Western countries).
Why SHOULD the government bail them out? Somebody buy your house for you? How about if you want a home, you save & buy one. Quit expecting the gvt. to do everything for you. Look @ the lines @ the post office and DMV, and see how “efficient” they are NOT.
Gvt. feeds itself first, then trickles down to the hungry little birds waiting for their worms. It doesn’t matter to the birds where the gvt. gets the worms for them, they just want. Enough.
If Clinton hadn’t convince FM/FM to make subprime rate loans, and require NOTHING down, and people would have used better judgment, there would have been no crisis.
Who says everyone should buy a home? Renting until you CAN afford a home makes a lot more sense than over-extending, looking at the “I want” rather than the “I need”, etc.
wow, go paison! we always yell when we talk. you should’ve pulled the ethnos card just for fun. YOU WERE GREAT. i’ve never watched you, but i loved what i saw. i’m sending this to all my italian friends. we know you’re not yelling. that’s how we all talk!
Obama and GE silenced this guy and threatened him to keep him quiet. Liberals are fucking worse than the ***** and none of them have a fucking clue.pretty soon the only ones with rights will be criminals and illegals….
Rick’s the Junkyard Dog doing his job, trying to protect the little guy from Big Uncle. Obama’s guy called him a derivitives trader. God knows that’s like a Riverboat Gambler. He bets on the USA.
November 6th, 2009 at 6:25 pm
johnswee
mark my words, cnbc is going to give him a show. and it will fail, because rick santelli is a no talent *** clown. we were already paying their mortgages at that point, would have continued to regardless, and will continue to forever. but whatever makes you feel better . . .
November 8th, 2009 at 6:22 pm
carney
why **** rick? Because he knows what hes talking about?
Fuck you for being an idiot
November 9th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
zapata
rick…
FUCK YOU!!!!!
November 10th, 2009 at 10:29 am
jeffrey
This was the beginning–Let History show it–Thank You Rick
November 13th, 2009 at 5:39 am
charlotte
Obama Health Care Reform will create 53 NEW Federal Bureaucracies. It is linked to Obama and Congress. It is linked to the people and business to the IRS. (I’m looking at an organizational flow chart)
What does that tell you? Taxes will go up, up, and, away to fund this MONSTER.
Reject it with all your might. Call your Representatives.
November 16th, 2009 at 4:53 am
lenmel
Hey steve-did your mommy put too much pressure on you when she stopped breastfeeding you at 14 years so that now you have to take it out on everyone else? Please man, withhold the expletives and you may get some respect, but right now you make yourself look like a person who watches too much **** after smoking a big fat doobie, after you’ve finished beating your wife at your trailer house where she’s paying the rent. Other than that you’re a nice person. Santelli for President. End of the story.
November 17th, 2009 at 4:39 pm
alexhi
Santelli’s full of ****. He’s never met a CORPORATE welfare recipient who’s **** he wouldn’t ****. So suddenly he’s all about fiscal prudence and responsibility?
Fucking lazy-ass c-lister shill for astroturfing lobby shacks. CNBC and he deserve each other.
November 20th, 2009 at 11:30 am
bolster
You can t tax your way into prosperity either.
November 21st, 2009 at 5:09 pm
endres
Santelli is right on. Speaking out with some Founding Fathers’ spirit and truth. THis is what we need more of – people who speak the truth and have the courage to draw a line in the sand and say “enough”. This is America, not Amerikka.
November 21st, 2009 at 10:57 pm
gloria
Fortunately, government isn’t that adept at “controlling” anything.
The only way out of this is to bankrupt the debt or print money to deflate it. We’ve actually had this before, in 1979, anid 1946, with 20 percent inflation. Looks like another round of late-1970s style economies, then another tech boom.
We will survive this. The pain will be spread through inflation and persistent unemployment, but we will survive.
November 23rd, 2009 at 1:23 pm
clinton
..the state; Barclays. The stock of that bank is now as strong as it was before the October crash of last year. But that is also one of the only banks that obviously didn´t participate in this great theft. As for the general situation we are now entering a “controlled depression”, where the government decides who are going to be the losers and who are the winners- of course the bankers win and the stockholders and the general population loses. This is us or them- they have to be ousted.
November 23rd, 2009 at 11:26 pm
blanbre
2ndand1: I think for me this boils down to a choice between supporting the banks and supporting the people. No matter how you look at it, the US´ deficit is going to grow on the short term, but by supporting the citizens, from which the money was stolen you have a cheaper solution to this situation than to give money to the banks. And people will get back what they have lost on their stocks if the government keeps out of the stock market. Look at the only UK bank that didn´t take money from..
November 24th, 2009 at 1:34 am
lawrence
were very unwise home purchases – NOT those who paid down, and had jobs they’ve lost, but the zero down, variable rates with payments already stretching a too-tight budget.
What about those who had to use savings or go under? Are they to be penalized b/ they survived foreclosure by being judicious? Everyone has felt the crunch, & I have friends who’ve lost a great deal of money b/of their stocks. I do not ascribe to the “Distribute the wealth” theory – & it’s not b/I have any – I don’t.
November 27th, 2009 at 4:26 am
stokley
I wholeheartedly agree with you about them stealing the money from the people, and it should be paid back. The credit card companies and banks gouge citizens – and now not only are they being bailed out by the very ones they’ve already gouged, they can continue. The housing market also, but I do not believe it should be paid to individuals. It should go toward the debt of our country.
Who is to determine who is in debt b/of economy or bad management? We’ve been bled too much already. There
November 28th, 2009 at 4:35 pm
albebrad
2ndand1: This is very simple. The government and the criminal bankers STOLE that money from the people. Now they should pay it back in the form of bailing out all those people who are now in debt because of the crisis, which has been orchestrated by the government itself and its criminal banker friends. If they don´t cancel the debts I am predicting a depression and a civil war in the USA (and this will spread very rapidly to other Western countries).
November 29th, 2009 at 12:43 am
keho
Why SHOULD the government bail them out? Somebody buy your house for you? How about if you want a home, you save & buy one. Quit expecting the gvt. to do everything for you. Look @ the lines @ the post office and DMV, and see how “efficient” they are NOT.
Gvt. feeds itself first, then trickles down to the hungry little birds waiting for their worms. It doesn’t matter to the birds where the gvt. gets the worms for them, they just want. Enough.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:01 am
howard
If Clinton hadn’t convince FM/FM to make subprime rate loans, and require NOTHING down, and people would have used better judgment, there would have been no crisis.
Who says everyone should buy a home? Renting until you CAN afford a home makes a lot more sense than over-extending, looking at the “I want” rather than the “I need”, etc.
December 3rd, 2009 at 8:53 am
roach
wow, go paison! we always yell when we talk. you should’ve pulled the ethnos card just for fun. YOU WERE GREAT. i’ve never watched you, but i loved what i saw. i’m sending this to all my italian friends. we know you’re not yelling. that’s how we all talk!
December 5th, 2009 at 4:25 am
nichwilk
thank you for a dose of common sense!
December 6th, 2009 at 8:35 am
giddings
Obama and GE silenced this guy and threatened him to keep him quiet. Liberals are fucking worse than the ***** and none of them have a fucking clue.pretty soon the only ones with rights will be criminals and illegals….
December 6th, 2009 at 6:27 pm
dolelli
Rick ,obviously, hasn’t received his stimulus.
December 9th, 2009 at 12:02 pm
karherr
Rick’s the Junkyard Dog doing his job, trying to protect the little guy from Big Uncle. Obama’s guy called him a derivitives trader. God knows that’s like a Riverboat Gambler. He bets on the USA.
December 10th, 2009 at 11:43 pm
vogel
Somebody nominate this guy for office!!!
December 12th, 2009 at 11:19 am
nearn
USA is fucked,liars thieves killers.mentally ill obese turds.
December 14th, 2009 at 10:19 pm
everbren
yeh lets just give billions to bankers